What Percentage Of Taxes Are Paid By The Rich?
Aug 17
Assorted Rich, Taxes 5 Comments
There is no debate that the rich pay a disproportionate amount of income taxes in the United States. Whether this is fair or not is a political discussion that I won’t address in this article. I’m more concerned about the reliability of statistics that are floating around.
You’ve probably heard that the top 20% of earners pay 80% the taxes and that the rich pay half the taxes. Are these comments true? What percentage of taxes do the rich pay?
To answer this question, let’s to go the authority on tax statistics – the Internal Revenue Service. The data used in this article comes straight from the IRS web site.
Before we get started, I’d like to make a few points:
- These statistics are based on returns, rather than people. The lower levels of income tend to have fewer people represented by a return (single people are over-represented in these levels). This means that you can’t say that 8274 EARNERS had an AGI of more than $10 million or more. This could be a dual income household where each spouse earns $5 million.
- Data is from tax year 2009. The is the most recent data available at the time this article was written.
- I’m not exactly sure what to make of the returns with no AGI. I have included this data for the sake of completeness, but this group likely includes a hodgepodge of exception statuses and the stats for this group might not make much sense. Caveat emptor!
Let’s take a look at the first table. This lists the percentage of returns for each income level, as well as the group’s percentage of the nation’s aggregate AGI ($7.6 trillion) and individual income taxes paid ($865 billion). Dollar amounts are in thousands. What data can we glean?
- The top 20.57% of returns – those with AGI of $75,000 or more – earn 62.37% of the nation’s AGI and pay 83.96% of the taxes. So the much quoted stat about the top 20% paying 80% of taxes is true (assuming it means 20% of returns).
- What about the rich paying half the taxes? This depends on your definition of “rich”, but returns with more than $200,000 in AGI represent 2.79% of all returns, earn 25.76% of AGI, and pay 50.14% of taxes.
- Returns claiming AGI of more than one million dollars represented 0.17% of all returns, but paid 20.49% of all taxes.
Here’s the data:
# of returns | % | AGI (thousands) |
% | Taxes paid (thousands) |
% | |
All returns | 140,494,127 | 7,626,430,723 | 865,948,695 | |||
No AGI | 2,511,925 | 1.79% | -198,958,452 | -2.61% | 85,376 | 0.01% |
$1 – $5,000 |
10,447,635 | 7.44% | 27,218,608 | 0.36% | 40,278 | 0.00% |
$5,000 – $10,000 |
12,220,335 | 8.70% | 92,407,278 | 1.21% | 379,851 | 0.04% |
$10,000 – $15,000 |
12,444,512 | 8.86% | 155,465,805 | 2.04% | 848,075 | 0.10% |
$15,000 – $20,000 |
11,400,228 | 8.11% | 199,017,560 | 2.61% | 2,516,274 | 0.29% |
$20,000 – $25,000 |
10,033,887 | 7.14% | 225,167,737 | 2.95% | 4,669,410 | 0.54% |
$25,000 – $30,000 |
8,662,392 | 6.17% | 237,994,230 | 3.12% | 6,827,564 | 0.79% |
$30,000 – $40,000 |
14,371,647 | 10.23% | 499,879,773 | 6.55% | 20,151,883 | 2.33% |
$40,000 – $50,000 |
10,796,412 | 7.68% | 483,088,798 | 6.33% | 25,404,305 | 2.93% |
$50,000 – $75,000 |
18,694,893 | 13.31% | 1,149,068,817 | 15.07% | 77,962,073 | 9.00% |
$75,000 – $100,000 |
11,463,725 | 8.16% | 990,337,913 | 12.99% | 80,492,622 | 9.30% |
$100,000 – $200,000 |
13,522,048 | 9.62% | 1,801,446,897 | 23.62% | 212,290,589 | 24.52% |
$200,000 – $500,000 |
3,195,039 | 2.27% | 905,347,402 | 11.87% | 176,322,148 | 20.36% |
$500,000 – $1,000,000 |
492,568 | 0.35% | 332,037,478 | 4.35% | 80,458,186 | 9.29% |
$1,000,000 – $1,500,000 |
108,096 | 0.08% | 130,149,237 | 1.71% | 32,755,871 | 3.78% |
$1,500,000 – $2,000,000 |
44,273 | 0.03% | 76,148,200 | 1.00% | 19,393,235 | 2.24% |
$2,000,000 – $5,000,000 |
61,918 | 0.04% | 182,986,391 | 2.40% | 46,943,630 | 5.42% |
$5,000,000 – $10,000,000 |
14,322 | 0.01% | 97,493,167 | 1.28% | 24,617,005 | 2.84% |
$10,000,000 or more |
8,274 | 0.01% | 240,133,885 | 3.15% | 53,790,324 | 6.21% |
OK, but what rate does everyone pay? In the next table, I’ve simply divided the taxes paid by the AGI to determine the effective tax rate.
A couple of observations:
- Returns with an AGI of $10 million or more have an effective rate significantly lower than several other income levels. Why? Capital gains. Note that this income level doesn’t have an upper bound, and the more extreme outliers are generally going to be the result of capital gains. It’s much more difficult to earn $1 billion in wages than $1 billion in capital gains (I’m speaking in relative terms; both are extremely difficult to do).
- There’s a noticeable jump between the 100-200K group and the 200-500K group. Not only are there some rate increases in these levels, but you will also see the effect of phase-outs of certain itemized deductions.
Here’s the data:
# of returns | % | AGI (thousands) |
Tax paid (thousands) |
Effective rate |
|
All returns | 140,494,127 | 7,626,430,723 | 865,948,695 | 11.35% | |
No AGI | 2,511,925 | 1.79% | -198,958,452 | 85,376 | -0.04% |
$1 – $5,000 | 10,447,635 | 7.44% | 27,218,608 | 40,278 | 0.15% |
$5,000 – $10,000 | 12,220,335 | 8.70% | 92,407,278 | 379,851 | 0.41% |
$10,000 – $15,000 | 12,444,512 | 8.86% | 155,465,805 | 848,075 | 0.55% |
$15,000 – $20,000 | 11,400,228 | 8.11% | 199,017,560 | 2,516,274 | 1.26% |
$20,000 – $25,000 | 10,033,887 | 7.14% | 225,167,737 | 4,669,410 | 2.07% |
$25,000 – $30,000 | 8,662,392 | 6.17% | 237,994,230 | 6,827,564 | 2.87% |
$30,000 – $40,000 | 14,371,647 | 10.23% | 499,879,773 | 20,151,883 | 4.03% |
$40,000 – $50,000 | 10,796,412 | 7.68% | 483,088,798 | 25,404,305 | 5.26% |
$50,000 – $75,000 | 18,694,893 | 13.31% | 1,149,068,817 | 77,962,073 | 6.78% |
$75,000 – $100,000 | 11,463,725 | 8.16% | 990,337,913 | 80,492,622 | 8.13% |
$100,000 – $200,000 | 13,522,048 | 9.62% | 1,801,446,897 | 212,290,589 | 11.78% |
$200,000 – $500,000 | 3,195,039 | 2.27% | 905,347,402 | 176,322,148 | 19.48% |
$500,000 – $1,000,000 | 492,568 | 0.35% | 332,037,478 | 80,458,186 | 24.23% |
$1,000,000 – $1,500,000 | 108,096 | 0.08% | 130,149,237 | 32,755,871 | 25.17% |
$1,500,000 – $2,000,000 | 44,273 | 0.03% | 76,148,200 | 19,393,235 | 25.47% |
$2,000,000 – $5,000,000 | 61,918 | 0.04% | 182,986,391 | 46,943,630 | 25.65% |
$5,000,000 – $10,000,000 | 14,322 | 0.01% | 97,493,167 | 24,617,005 | 25.25% |
$10,000,000 or more | 8,274 | 0.01% | 240,133,885 | 53,790,324 | 22.40% |
As a whole, the aggregate effective tax rate is 11.35%. For each $100 of AGI, the government will collect $11.35 in taxes. The 100-200K group is basically right at this level, but the other income levels drift far away from this baseline. What percent of the “expected” taxes are paid at each income level (based on the expectation of $11.35 in taxes paid on each $100 of AGI).
I’ll let you peruse this data without any observations, other than pointing out that 100% would be equal to the expected 11.35% effective rate.
All returns |
% AGI | % tax | % baseline |
No AGI | -2.61% | 0.01% | -0.38% |
$1 – $5,000 | 0.36% | 0.00% | 1.30% |
$5,000 – $10,000 | 1.21% | 0.04% | 3.62% |
$10,000 – $15,000 | 2.04% | 0.10% | 4.80% |
$15,000 – $20,000 | 2.61% | 0.29% | 11.14% |
$20,000 – $25,000 | 2.95% | 0.54% | 18.26% |
$25,000 – $30,000 | 3.12% | 0.79% | 25.27% |
$30,000 – $40,000 | 6.55% | 2.33% | 35.50% |
$40,000 – $50,000 | 6.33% | 2.93% | 46.31% |
$50,000 – $75,000 | 15.07% | 9.00% | 59.75% |
$75,000 – $100,000 | 12.99% | 9.30% | 71.58% |
$100,000 – $200,000 | 23.62% | 24.52% | 103.79% |
$200,000 – $500,000 | 11.87% | 20.36% | 171.52% |
$500,000 – $1,000,000 | 4.35% | 9.29% | 213.41% |
$1,000,000 – $1,500,000 | 1.71% | 3.78% | 221.65% |
$1,500,000 – $2,000,000 | 1.00% | 2.24% | 224.30% |
$2,000,000 – $5,000,000 | 2.40% | 5.42% | 225.94% |
$5,000,000 – $10,000,000 | 1.28% | 2.84% | 222.38% |
$10,000,000 or more | 3.15% | 6.21% | 197.28% |
Aug 18, 2011 @ 16:38:12
What I see from this data is that if you put a 15% flat tax with no deductions for anything, the net income to the government would go up. Such a tax would hurt me, I have a house and kids and pay less than 15% now ( I am not among the “rich”).
Aug 18, 2011 @ 16:44:23
Yes, 15% flat tax will no examptions or deductions would generate more revenu the the current system. Should we make that person earning $10,000 per year pay $1500 in federal taxes? That’s the multibillion dollar question.
Aug 19, 2011 @ 12:08:51
If we did institute a tax on EVERYONE, then more people will support an across the board cut in taxes, then we could get away from the Millionaires and Billionaires commentary that we are subject to almost every night on the news and on the political commercials.
Think of the costs saving is no-one actually had to fill out an income tax form (of course that would destroy the tax preparation industry). Put all the onus on the employer or commission provider to deduct the taxes and the IRS could audit every company every year to keep their staff (I don’t want to become a target of the IRS by suggesting that they get reduced).
This whole discussion just points out that with enough numbers you can make any argument.
Aug 19, 2011 @ 12:45:44
Here’s a quote from a national newspaper the day after you introduce your bill:
“Congressman Martin Kelly introduces bill to raise taxes on 97% of Americans”
See why members of congress might be hesitant to vote for a 15% flat tax? Only 3% of the voters in your district would benefit. Whether it’s fair or not isn’t the point; it would be political suicide (especially if the bill became law and people actually saw the effects first hand).
What this boils down to is whether everyone should pay taxes on the entire income, or their disposable income. Is there a point where you say “Hey, make sure you have enough food to eat and shelter from the elements so that you don’t die of starvation or exposure, and worry about paying for road maintenance and national security later?” If there is such a point, where does it stop?
Of course, the super wealthy pay an effective rate slightly above 15%, because their capital gains income dwarfs their wages, interest, etc. Warren Buffett is not exaggerating when he says that he is taxed a lower rate than his assistants – he is being quite accurate.